Dr. Martin Gencik, FA für Medizinische Genetik
Brünnlbadgasse 15, 1090 Wien
Tel: 01/95 80 164, Fax: 01/89 07 943
e-mail: mikrobiom@medgene.at, Web: mikrobiom.medgene.at
RESULT URINE MICROBIOME
Indication
Urinary bacterial profile for differentiating eubiosis/dysbiosis
Diagnosis
Three potentially pathogenic species were identified among the six most common bacterial species in the analysed urine sample: Ralstonia pickettii (approx. 32%), Herbaspirillum huttiense (approx. 31%) and Escherichia coli (approx. 6%). This composition indicates a high probability of urinary dysbiosis. Escherichia coli in particular is known to be one of the main causes of infections of the female urinary tract (1-3).
Results

Most frequently detected bacterial species

Ralstonia pickettii: 32.25%
Potentially pathogenic
Ralstonia pickettii is primarily an environmental bacterium, but it is also associated with human infections. It can cause various infections, including respiratory infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and cystic fibrosis patients. The bacterium has been isolated from various clinical samples, including blood, urine, wound infections and cerebrospinal fluid.
Herbaspirillum huttiense: 30.66%
Potentially pathogenic
Herbaspirillum huttiense is an environmental proteobacterium that is rarely associated with human infections. Nevertheless, it has been detected in isolated cases, for example in bacteraemia. Infections caused by this bacterium can be favoured by contact with environmental sources such as pond cleaning or gardening.
Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii: 11.14%
Rare bacterium
The significance of Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii in urine is not precisely defined. It is not considered a common pathogen.
Cutibacterium acnes: 5.78%
Rare bacterium
The significance of Cutibacterium acnes in urine is not precisely defined. This bacterium of normal skin colonisation is not considered a common pathogen.
Escherichia coli: 5.57%
Potentially pathogenic
This bacterium is one of the most common causes of urinary tract infections (UTIs).
Staphylococcus epidermidis: 5.57%
Rare bacterium
The significance of Staphylococcus_epidermidis is not precisely defined. It is not considered a common pathogen.

'Percentage of the most common species in the sample compared to the reference population (white line = 50th percentile). The black bar/arrow shows the value for this sample. 75 % of the population falls into the green range. A minority of the reference samples have values in the yellow/orange range. Note that for potential pathogens, values higher than the majority of the population in the orange range indicate an over-representation of the pathogen, while values lower than the majority of the population indicate an under-representation of the pathogen and are comparatively better than most samples.'
Dr. Martin Gencik, FA für Medizinische Genetik
Brünnlbadgasse 15, 1090 Wien
Tel: 01/95 80 164, Fax: 01/89 07 943
e-mail: mikrobiom@medgene.at, Web: mikrobiom.medgene.at
Bacteria species bar chart
Coloured bars represent the relative distribution of bacterial species.
Bar chart types

Dr. Martin Gencik, FA für Medizinische Genetik
Brünnlbadgasse 15, 1090 Wien
Tel: 01/95 80 164, Fax: 01/89 07 943
e-mail: mikrobiom@medgene.at, Web: mikrobiom.medgene.at
Species reference diagram - total microbiome
Sunburst diagram - The coloured discs represent the relative representation of the bacterial taxa. The centre ring is the lowest resolution (domain/kingdom), followed by phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, the last outer ring is the individual amplicon sequence variant (ASV) DNA sequences for the species. Note that strains usually have multiple ASVs. The last number in the ASV ring is the percent identity (PID) to the named species. Novel strains usually have a lower PID than known strains. Closely related strains have a PID of more than 98%.
Species Sunburst Diagram

Dr. Martin Gencik, FA für Medizinische Genetik
Brünnlbadgasse 15, 1090 Wien
Tel: 01/95 80 164, Fax: 01/89 07 943
e-mail: mikrobiom@medgene.at, Web: mikrobiom.medgene.at
Species table - Total microbiome
List of all species in the urine sample and their relative proportion
Species table
Dr. Martin Gencik, FA für Medizinische Genetik
Brünnlbadgasse 15, 1090 Wien
Tel: 01/95 80 164, Fax: 01/89 07 943
e-mail: mikrobiom@medgene.at, Web: mikrobiom.medgene.at
General Report Information

Interpretation
The bacterial composition of the analysed urinary microbiome, consisting of typical environmental, skin and intestinal bacteria, shows some unusual features that could indicate a possible dysbiosis or infection.

1.Ralstonia pickettii (32.25%): This environmental bacterium, commonly found in water sources, can cause opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients. The presence of such a high concentration in urine is unusual and could indicate both contamination and possible infection, especially in the presence of clinical symptoms.

2.Herbaspirillum huttiense (30.66%): This environmental bacterium is typically found in soil and water and is rarely associated with urinary tract infections. However, it could cause opportunistic infections in people with weakened immune systems.

3.Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii (11.14%): This bacterial species is part of the normal skin flora but has also been associated with infections, particularly breast infections. Its detection in the urinary tract could indicate skin contamination or a potential infection.

4.Cutibacterium acnes (5.78%): This bacterial species is normally found on the skin and is rarely associated with urinary tract infections. Its detection in urine could indicate skin contamination during sample collection.

5.Escherichia coli (5.57%): E. coli is the most common trigger of urinary tract infections. Although the proportion is relatively low in this case, its detection could indicate the onset of an infection, especially in the case of symptoms such as burning or pain when urinating.

6.Staphylococcus epidermidis (5.57%): This bacterial species is a component of the normal skin flora, but can occur as an opportunistic pathogen in the urinary tract, especially in people with catheters or a weakened immune system.

7.Streptococcus mitis (1.45%): This streptococcus normally belongs to the oral microflora and is rarely associated with urinary tract infections. Its detection in urine could indicate contamination.

8.Clostridium disporicum (0.43%): This bacterium is rarely associated with urinary tract infections and is normally found in the gut. Its detection in urine could indicate contamination by intestinal bacteria.

Overall assessment: The high prevalence of environmental bacteria such as Ralstonia pickettii and Herbaspirillum huttiense together with opportunistic pathogens such as Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii and Staphylococcus epidermidis could indicate contamination of the sample. However, these bacteria could also cause infections in immunocompromised individuals. The detection of Escherichia coli may indicate an incipient or mild urinary tract infection, even if the proportion is relatively low. However, the final assessment of a dysbiosis or infection depends largely on the clinical symptoms (e.g. burning sensation when urinating, pain or fever) and other laboratory parameters (such as leucocytes in the urine). A comprehensive clinical examination is required to clarify whether treatment is necessary.

Personalised supportive therapies
The analysed urinary microbiome shows potential imbalances, including opportunistic pathogens such as Ralstonia pickettii, Herbaspirillum huttiense and Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii. In such cases, the use of probiotic strains could be a promising strategy to restore a healthy microbial balance. The effect of selected probiotics has been well documented in numerous studies:

1. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: These two strains have been extensively studied and are often recommended to promote urogenital health. They show an ability to inhibit the growth of opportunistic pathogens such as Escherichia coli and support a healthy microbial balance in the urinary and genital tract. Studies show that they can reduce the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) by strengthening the epithelial barrier function and modulating the immune system.

2. Lactobacillus crispatus: This strain is a central component of healthy vaginal and urogenital microflora and is associated with a reduced prevalence of urogenital infections. By lowering the pH and inhibiting the growth of potentially pathogenic bacteria, Lactobacillus crispatus contributes significantly to microbial homeostasis.

3. Lactobacillus plantarum is known for its antimicrobial properties and its ability to suppress the growth of uropathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In addition, this strain shows anti-inflammatory effects that can be beneficial in cases of microbial imbalances.

4. Bifidobacterium bifidum plays an important role in the regulation of the gut-urinary axis, as many microorganisms in the urinary tract may have originated in the gut. This probiotic strain supports the immune system and helps to stabilise the microflora.

A combination of the strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1, Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14, Lactobacillus crispatus and Bifidobacterium bifidum could be particularly beneficial for regulating the urogenital microflora. However, the selection of the appropriate probiotic should be based on individual clinical symptoms and in consultation with a physician.

Material
ZymoResearch Urine Conditioning Buffer D3061-1, DNA/RNA Shield R1100
Localization: Urine
Description: Urinary bacterial profile

Methods

The urine sample was collected according to the instructions. The samples were stabilised with urine conditioning buffer (ZymoResearch) for transport to the laboratory. DNA isolation was performed with ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep, Cat: D4300. DNA barcoding and library preparation were performed using the Intus Biosciences StrainID Kit (Intus Biosciences) and the LSK-114 Kit (Oxford Nanopore). The 2.5 kb base pair PCR products were sequenced with a MinION MK1C on a flow cell 10.4.1 (Oxford Nanopore) and analysed with the Titan Bioinformatics Pipeline (Intus Biosciences).

Literature

Literature used to prepare the report and the conclusions.

1. Sheng Z, Li J, Han G, Fan R, Zhu P, Fang X. Molecular epidemiological and clinical infection characteristics analysis of Ralstonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;43(6):1161-1170; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04823-w
2. Yuan C, An T, Li X, Zou J, Lin Z, Gu J, Hu R, Fang Z. Genomic analysis of Ralstonia pickettii reveals the genetic features for potential pathogenicity and adaptive evolution in drinking water. Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 2;14:1272636; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1272636
3. Ruiz de Villa A, Alok A, Oyetoran AE, Fabara SP. Septic Shock and Bacteremia Secondary to Herbaspirillum huttiense: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36155; https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36155
4. Zhou Y, Zhou Z, Zheng L, Gong Z, Li Y, Jin Y, Huang Y, Chi M. Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Mechanisms of Infection and Treatment Options. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 23;24(13):10537; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310537
5. Kustrimovic N, Bilato G, Mortara L, Baci D. The Urinary Microbiome in Health and Disease: Relevance for Bladder Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 31;25(3):1732; Kustrimovic N, Bilato G, Mortara L, Baci D. The Urinary Microbiome in Health and Disease: Relevance for Bladder Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 31;25(3):1732
6. Garretto A, Miller-Ensminger T, Ene A, Merchant Z, Shah A, Gerodias A, Biancofiori A, Canchola S, Canchola S, Castillo E, Chowdhury T, Gandhi N, Hamilton S, Hatton K, Hyder S, Krull K, Lagios D, Lam T, Mitchell K, Mortensen C, Murphy A, Richburg J, Rokas M, Ryclik S, Sulit P, Szwajnos T, Widuch M, Willis J, Woloszyn M, Brassil B, Johnson G, Mormando R, Maskeri L, Batrich M, Stark N, Shapiro JW, Montelongo Hernandez C, Banerjee S, Wolfe AJ, Putonti C. Genomic Survey of E. coli From the Bladders of Women With and Without Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 4;11:2094. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02094; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.02094
7. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Marra M, Zummo S, Biondo C. Urinary Tract Infections: The Current Scenario and Future Prospects. Pathogens. 2023; 12(4):623. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040623
8. Klein, R.D., Hultgren, S.J. Urinary tract infections: microbial pathogenesis, host–pathogen interactions and new treatment strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 18, 211–226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0324-0
9. Wagenlehner, F.M.E., Bjerklund Johansen, T.E., Cai, T. et al. Epidemiology, definition and treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol 17, 586–600 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0362-4
10. Hinić V, Lang C, Weisser M, Straub C, Frei R, Goldenberger D. 2012. Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum: a Potentially Misidentified and Multiresistant Corynebacterium Species Isolated from Clinical Specimens. J Clin Microbiol 50: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00386-12
11. Gilbert NM, O'Brien VP, Lewis AL. Transient microbiota exposures activate dormant Escherichia coli infection in the bladder and drive severe outcomes of recurrent disease. PLoS Pathog. 2017 Mar 30;13(3):e1006238. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006238. PMID: 28358889; PMCID: PMC5373645.
12. Werneburg GT. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Res Rep Urol. 2022 Apr 4;14:109-133. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S273663. PMID: 35402319; PMCID: PMC8992741.
13. William Stokes, Michael D Parkins, Elizabeth C T Parfitt, Juan C Ruiz, Gerry Mugford, Daniel B Gregson, Incidence and Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriuria: A Population-based Study, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 69, Issue 6, 15 September 2019, Pages 963–969, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy1000
^14. Lafon, T., Hernandez Padilla, A.C., Baisse, A. et al. Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria: a warning microbiological marker for infective endocarditis?. BMC Infect Dis 19, 504 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4106-0
14. Kierzkowska, M., Markowska, K., Majewska, A. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Staphylococcus pettenkoferi. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2022, 14, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.3390/idr14010015
15. Djawadi, B., Heidari, N., & Mohseni, M. (2023). UTI Caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.110275
16. Peter K. Kurotschka, MD, Ildiko Gagyor, MD, Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS Acute Uncomplicated UTIs in Adults: Rapid Evidence Review, Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(2):167-174
17. Yoo, J.-J., Song, J.S., Kim, W.B., Yun, J., Shin, H.B., Jang, M.-A., Ryu, C.B., Kim, S.S., Chung, J.C., Kuk, J.C., et al. Gardnerella vaginalis in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Is Associated with Dysbiosis of the Bladder Microbiome. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092295
18. Xu K, Wang Y, Jian Y, Chen T, Liu Q, Wang H, Li M and He L (2023) Staphylococcus aureus ST1 promotes persistent urinary tract infection by highly expressing the urease. Front. Microbiol. 14:1101754. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1101754
19. Yamamuro R, Hosokawa N, Otsuka Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Corynebacterium Bacteremia Caused by Different Species, Japan, 2014–2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2021;27(12):2981-2987. doi:10.3201/eid2712.210473.
20. Gupta et al., 2024: Effectiveness of prophylactic oral and/or vaginal probiotic supplementation in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 78, 1154–1161; https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad766. 21. Shoureshi et al., 2023: Can vaginal lactobacillus suppositories help reduce urinary tract infections?, Int Urogynecol J 34, 2713–2718; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05568-4. 22. Aljohani et al., 2024: The health benefits of probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Probiotics & Antimicro Prot, 10287-3; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10287-3. 23. Chen et al., 2021: Recent development of probiotic Bifidobacteria for treating human diseases, Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9, 770248; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.770248.

Note: We would like to point out that the results of molecular genetic tests should always be considered and interpreted in a clinical context.


Dr.med. Martin Gencik Dr. phil. Alfred Schöller Vivien Horvath MSc.


Specialist in Medical Genetics Biologist Nutrition scientist